{"id":1279,"date":"2019-04-04T07:12:27","date_gmt":"2019-04-04T07:12:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/?p=1279"},"modified":"2019-04-04T07:16:54","modified_gmt":"2019-04-04T07:16:54","slug":"diplomats-activists-decry-chinese-threats-at-un-rights-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/?p=1279","title":{"rendered":"Diplomats, activists decry Chinese \u2018threats\u2019 at UN rights council"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>By Nina Larson<\/span><\/p>\n

Diplomats and activists on Monday denounced intense Chinese lobbying, pressure and even threats to rein in criticism of Beijing during last month’s session of the UN Human Rights Council.<\/p>\n

Human Rights Watch charged that the Chinese mission in Geneva had sent a letter to a number of missions urging them to stay away from a US-organized event on March 13 about China’s treatment of Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang province.<\/p>\n

The letter, signed by Ambassador Yu Jianhua and seen by AFP, tells countries “not to co-sponsor, participate in or be present at this side event… in the interest of our bilateral relations and continued multilateral cooperation.”
\nHRW slammed these “threats,” with the organization’s Geneva director John Fisher warning that the public outcry over the treatment of Muslim minorities had “sent China into panic mode.”
\nChinese officials, he said in a statement, are now “using public as well as private pressure to block concerted international action.”<\/p>\n

The Chinese mission did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation and comment.
\nBut several diplomats confirmed to AFP that their missions had received the letter ahead of the event.
\nIt took place on the sidelines of the rights council’s three-week session and focused on allegations that upwards of one-million Uighurs and other mostly Muslim Turkic minorities are being held in detention centres in Xinjiang.<\/p>\n

China maintains instead that the Uighurs and others are at “campuses” for vocational training set up to counter radicalisation.
\nXinjiang, which shares a border with several countries including Pakistan and Afghanistan, has long seen violent unrest, which China claims is orchestrated by an organised “terrorist” movement seeking the region’s independence.<\/p>\n

But many Uighurs and Xinjiang experts say the violence stems largely from spontaneous outbursts of anger at Chinese cultural and religious repression, and that Beijing plays up terrorism to justify tight control of the resource-rich region.
\nBy Nina Larson<\/p>\n

Diplomats and activists on Monday denounced intense Chinese lobbying, pressure and even threats to rein in criticism of Beijing during last month’s session of the UN Human Rights Council.<\/p>\n

Human Rights Watch charged that the Chinese mission in Geneva had sent a letter to a number of missions urging them to stay away from a US-organized event on March 13 about China’s treatment of Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang province.<\/p>\n

The letter, signed by Ambassador Yu Jianhua and seen by AFP, tells countries “not to co-sponsor, participate in or be present at this side event… in the interest of our bilateral relations and continued multilateral cooperation.”<\/p>\n

Diplomats, activists decry Chinese \u2018threats\u2019 at UN rights council<\/p>\n

Nothing but blood and tears. File photo of an unidentified protester wearing a mask painted with the flag of Xinjiang, also known as East Turkestan, and tears of blood in Brussels, Belgium, in April last year, evocative of what political observers say are the crimes against humanity committed by Chinese officials with their continued \u2018atrocious actions\u2019 in the disputed South China Sea. AFP<\/p>\n

HRW slammed these “threats,” with the organization’s Geneva director John Fisher warning that the public outcry over the treatment of Muslim minorities had “sent China into panic mode.”
\nChinese officials, he said in a statement, are now “using public as well as private pressure to block concerted international action.”<\/p>\n

The Chinese mission did not immediately respond to a request for confirmation and comment.
\nBut several diplomats confirmed to AFP that their missions had received the letter ahead of the event.
\nIt took place on the sidelines of the rights council’s three-week session and focused on allegations that upwards of one-million Uighurs and other mostly Muslim Turkic minorities are being held in detention centres in Xinjiang.<\/p>\n

China maintains instead that the Uighurs and others are at “campuses” for vocational training set up to counter radicalisation.
\nXinjiang, which shares a border with several countries including Pakistan and Afghanistan, has long seen violent unrest, which China claims is orchestrated by an organised “terrorist” movement seeking the region’s independence.<\/p>\n

But many Uighurs and Xinjiang experts say the violence stems largely from spontaneous outbursts of anger at Chinese cultural and religious repression, and that Beijing plays up terrorism to justify tight control of the resource-rich region.<\/p>\n

‘Stage-manage everything’<\/p>\n

On Monday, several diplomats backed HRW’s claim that China had exerted significant pressure on countries to speak on its behalf during the conclusion of a review of its rights record before the council on March 15.<\/p>\n

“They were doing their best to stage-manage everything,” a Western diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, told AFP.
\n“When you see how few countries spoke up about Xinjiang, I am sure it did have an effect,” the diplomat added.<\/p>\n

“They are not staying idle,” another Western diplomat said.
\nAccording to HRW, Chinese officials pressured the UN to remove elements provided by UN experts and NGOs from the so-called Universal Periodic Review report and tried to block the accreditation of Uighur activist Dolkun Isa.<\/p>\n

A UN official told AFP that “receiving pressure from governments attempting to silence critics is fairly common, but a particularly high number of these complaints come from China about the credibility of participants.”
\n“This session was particularly bad,” acknowledged the UN official, who asked not to be named.
\nHRW also charged that China had intentionally pushed friendly states to flood the speakers’ list for the 20 minutes allocated to countries’ concluding remarks.<\/p>\n

Nearly 100 countries requested the right to speak\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u2014over three times more than usual in this situation\u2014but only 13 were permitted to take the floor.<\/p>\n

In advance, the rights council drew the name of the first country, Mali, from a hat, and from there countries were called upon in alphabetical order, through to the Philippines.<\/p>\n

This meant that most critical voices from Europe and North America were not called upon, with only Norway speaking up against China’s Xinjiang policies.<\/p>\n

Non-governmental organizations were also given a chance to speak, but there too, groups praising China grabbed six of the 10 available speaking slots.<\/p>\n

“It speaks volumes that China felt it necessary to twist arms and mount propaganda displays to try to suppress scrutiny of its rights record,” Fisher said.<\/p>\n

Source: http:\/\/manilastandard.net\/opinion\/columns\/291624\/diplomats-activists-decry-chinese-threats-at-un-rights-council.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Nina Larson Diplomats and activists on Monday denounced intense Chinese lobbying, pressure and even threats to rein in criticism of Beijing during last month’s session of the UN Human Rights Council. Human Rights Watch charged that the Chinese mission in Geneva had sent a letter to a number of missions urging them to stay […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uyghur-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1279"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1286,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279\/revisions\/1286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.uyghuracademy.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}